List:Commits« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Rafal Somla Date:June 26 2008 1:58pm
Subject:Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (svoj:2638) Bug#37012
View as plain text  
Øystein,

I think it is better to test for a pipe in the open() method. One could want to 
create Output_stream instance even when the underlying pipe does not yet exist 
or is a regular file. Only when we open the stream, it is important that the 
path points at valid pipe (or no such file exists). This is remote possibility 
but why to restrict flexibility without a reason?

Rafal

  Grøvlen wrote:
> Sergey,
> 
> I think a test for this functionality needs to be included.
> 
> I also wonder whether it would be better to put the new code in the 
> constructor.  I think putting the m_flags logic in one place instead of 
> spreading it, would make the code easier to understand.
> 
Thread
bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (svoj:2638) Bug#37012Sergey Vojtovich19 Jun
  • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (svoj:2638) Bug#37012Rafal Somla23 Jun
  • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (svoj:2638) Bug#37012Øystein Grøvlen25 Jun
    • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (svoj:2638) Bug#37012Rafal Somla26 Jun
      • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (svoj:2638) Bug#37012Øystein Grøvlen27 Jun
        • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (svoj:2638) Bug#37012Rafal Somla27 Jun
Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-backup branch (svoj:2638) Bug#37012Øystein Grøvlen26 Jun