| List: | Commits | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Chuck Bell | Date: | June 12 2008 3:53pm |
| Subject: | RE: bk commit into 6.0 tree (istruewing:1.2623) | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Ingo, With regards to my comment: > > Please specify WL#4259 in the patch comments. It would be easier to > > track it there were. > > I would prefer a number that is related to backup testing. > The conversion is not part of the implementation of DEBUG_SYNC. What about BUG#34235 Random failure of wait_condition.inc with information_schema.processlist? This is the bug that the tests were disabled under. Just a suggestion. Chuck
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • bk commit into 6.0 tree (istruewing:1.2623) | Ingo Struewing | 6 Jun |
| • RE: bk commit into 6.0 tree (istruewing:1.2623) | Chuck Bell | 9 Jun |
| • Re: bk commit into 6.0 tree (istruewing:1.2623) | Ingo Strüwing | 11 Jun |
| • RE: bk commit into 6.0 tree (istruewing:1.2623) | Chuck Bell | 11 Jun |
| • RE: bk commit into 6.0 tree (istruewing:1.2623) | Chuck Bell | 12 Jun |
| • Re: bk commit into 6.0 tree (istruewing:1.2623) | Ingo Strüwing | 13 Jun |
| • Re: bk commit into 6.0 tree (istruewing:1.2623) | Rafal Somla | 12 Jun |
