Hi Ingo,
> > I get timeout errors on the backup_commit_blocker test on Windows.
Wouldn't you know it...I tested this again and I can't make it fail.
Nevermind... :|
> > Please specify WL#4259 in the patch comments. It would be easier to
> > track it there were.
>
> I would prefer a number that is related to backup testing.
> The conversion is not part of the implementation of DEBUG_SYNC.
Ok, well maybe we need a new WL or even a bug report.
> In my sync point philosophy, the sync point name reflects its
...
> I am also open for suggestion, how to rename the sync points
> so that their position in the code becomes more clear. But I
> politely refuse to rename the sync points after their
> function in a specific test. If you still want to have that,
> please take over.
I will wait and see what Rafal says. I think he has some ideas along this
line.
All other issues/responses were acceptable.
Chuck