List:Commits« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:He Zhenxing Date:June 10 2008 3:10am
Subject:Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree (hezx:2635)
WL#4398
View as plain text  
Hi

Agreed, then what's you opinion on using types such as uint32,
uchar,my_bool, etc. Should we use these types in plugin.h, or more
generally, should we use these types in the interfaces, or should we
just use int, long, char, bool instead.

On 2008-06-09 Mon 09:54 +0200, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Jun 09, Mats Kindahl wrote:
> > He Zhenxing wrote:
> > > Hi Mats
> > > 
> > > Did you noticed that I included <my_global.h> in plugin.h? 
> > > 
> > > The functions I added in plugin.h used some typedefs defined in it,
> > > such as uint32, uchar. I am not quite sure other stuffs defined in
> > > my_global.h should be exported or not.
> > 
> > No, actually I didn't. I'm reluctant to include my_global.h since it
> > contain a lot of dependencies on other code in the server... wait...
> > 
> > ... no, I don't think it is a fundamental problem to include the file.
> > There are a lot of definitions that are not really needed, but I see
> > no harm in including it from plugin.h, we just have to make sure that
> > it is part of the SDK as well.
> 
> No, please, don't inclue my_global.h in plugin.h, my_global.h is
> internal, we are changing it freely and want to continue doing that.
> plugin.h will be VERY soon strictly monitored to make it difficult for
> anybody to modify it, the less files are public the better.
> Besides, my_global.h is and always was written as internal - meaning
> nobody tried to avoid namespace conflicts when it's used with other
> projects' headers, nobody tried to minimize the dependencies, or
> definitions/declarations in it, etc. It cannot be made a part of the
> public API as is.
> 
> And it'd be best if your plugin would not need it, if at all possible.
> (for all plugins I've helped to create it's true, they don't need
> internal headers)
>  
> Regards / Mit vielen Grüssen,
> Sergei
> 

Thread
bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree (hezx:2635) WL#4398He Zhenxing5 Jun
  • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree (hezx:2635) WL#4398Mats Kindahl5 Jun
    • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree (hezx:2635)WL#4398He Zhenxing6 Jun
      • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree (hezx:2635)WL#4398He Zhenxing6 Jun
      • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree (hezx:2635) WL#4398Mats Kindahl9 Jun
        • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree (hezx:2635) WL#4398Sergei Golubchik9 Jun
          • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree (hezx:2635) WL#4398Mats Kindahl9 Jun
            • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree (hezx:2635)WL#4398He Zhenxing10 Jun
          • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree (hezx:2635)WL#4398He Zhenxing10 Jun
            • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree (hezx:2635)WL#4398Sergei Golubchik10 Jun
              • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree (hezx:2635)WL#4398He Zhenxing10 Jun
            • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree (hezx:2635) WL#4398Mats Kindahl10 Jun
              • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree(hezx:2635) WL#4398He Zhenxing10 Jun
                • Re: bzr commit into mysql-6.0-semi-sync-1.0 tree (hezx:2635) WL#4398Mats Kindahl10 Jun