| List: | Commits | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Ingo Strüwing | Date: | April 16 2008 7:36pm |
| Subject: | Re: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2606) BUG#34721 | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Hi Rafal, Rafal Somla, 16.04.2008 20:32: > Hi Ingo, > > Looks that we differ in our interpretation of coding guidelines and in > understanding of how they should be used. Let's try to differ in a > beautiful way, as they say :) Ok. This time I agree. :) ... > If the snapshot is valid, it is added to the snapshots list (a member of > Backup_info class). Ah. Ok. That explains it. Thanks. Regards Ingo -- Ingo Strüwing, Senior Software Developer MySQL GmbH, Dachauer Str. 37, D-80335 München Geschäftsführer: Kaj Arnö - HRB München 162140
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2606) BUG#34721 | rsomla | 31 Mar |
| • Re: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2606) BUG#34721 | Ingo Strüwing | 9 Apr |
| • Re: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2606) BUG#34721 | Rafal Somla | 10 Apr |
| • Re: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2606) BUG#34721 | Ingo Strüwing | 15 Apr |
| • Re: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2606) BUG#34721 | Rafal Somla | 16 Apr |
| • Re: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2606) BUG#34721 | Ingo Strüwing | 16 Apr |
