From: Date: April 10 2008 5:56pm
Subject: svn commit - mysqldoc@docsrva: r10443 - in trunk: it/refman-5.1 pt/refman-5.1 refman-4.1 refman-5.0 refman-5.1 refman-6.0
List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/45206
Message-Id: <200804101556.m3AFuiMk002776@docsrva.mysql.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Author: jstephens
Date: 2008-04-10 17:56:43 +0200 (Thu, 10 Apr 2008)
New Revision: 10443
Log:
CONCURRENT replicated by RBR, but not replicated by SBR
(Ref. Bug #34628 - Thanks, Sveta!)
Modified:
trunk/it/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml
trunk/it/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml
trunk/pt/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml
trunk/pt/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml
trunk/refman-4.1/replication.xml
trunk/refman-4.1/sql-syntax.xml
trunk/refman-5.0/replication-notes.xml
trunk/refman-5.0/sql-syntax.xml
trunk/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml
trunk/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml
trunk/refman-6.0/replication-notes.xml
trunk/refman-6.0/sql-syntax.xml
Modified: trunk/it/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml
===================================================================
--- trunk/it/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442)
+++ trunk/it/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443)
Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 12, Lines Deleted: 0; 1024 bytes
@@ -958,6 +958,18 @@
running MySQL 4.0 or earlier.
+
+ When using statement-based replication, the LOAD DATA
+ INFILE statement's CONCURRENT
+ option is not replicated; that is, LOAD DATA CONCURRENT
+ INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA
+ INFILE, and LOAD DATA CONCURRENT LOCAL
+ INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA LOCAL
+ INFILE. The CONCURRENT option
+ is replicated when using row-based
+ replication. (Bug #34628)
+
+
Modified: trunk/it/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml
===================================================================
--- trunk/it/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442)
+++ trunk/it/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443)
Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 8, Lines Deleted: 0; 757 bytes
@@ -7927,6 +7927,14 @@
even if no other thread is using the table at the same time.
+
+ CONCURRENT is not replicated when using
+ statement-based replication; however, it is replicated when
+ using row-based replication. See
+ , for more
+ information.
+
+
Prior to MySQL 5.1.23, LOAD DATA performed
Modified: trunk/pt/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml
===================================================================
--- trunk/pt/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442)
+++ trunk/pt/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443)
Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 12, Lines Deleted: 0; 1024 bytes
@@ -958,6 +958,18 @@
running MySQL 4.0 or earlier.
+
+ When using statement-based replication, the LOAD DATA
+ INFILE statement's CONCURRENT
+ option is not replicated; that is, LOAD DATA CONCURRENT
+ INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA
+ INFILE, and LOAD DATA CONCURRENT LOCAL
+ INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA LOCAL
+ INFILE. The CONCURRENT option
+ is replicated when using row-based
+ replication. (Bug #34628)
+
+
Modified: trunk/pt/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml
===================================================================
--- trunk/pt/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442)
+++ trunk/pt/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443)
Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 8, Lines Deleted: 0; 757 bytes
@@ -7927,6 +7927,14 @@
even if no other thread is using the table at the same time.
+
+ CONCURRENT is not replicated when using
+ statement-based replication; however, it is replicated when
+ using row-based replication. See
+ , for more
+ information.
+
+
Prior to MySQL 5.1.23, LOAD DATA performed
Modified: trunk/refman-4.1/replication.xml
===================================================================
--- trunk/refman-4.1/replication.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442)
+++ trunk/refman-4.1/replication.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443)
Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 10, Lines Deleted: 0; 877 bytes
@@ -1807,6 +1807,16 @@
such cases, it is best to upgrade the master to 5.0 or later.
(Bug #31240)
+
+
+ The LOAD DATA INFILE statement's
+ CONCURRENT option is not replicated; that
+ is, LOAD DATA CONCURRENT INFILE is
+ replicated as LOAD DATA INFILE, and
+ LOAD DATA CONCURRENT LOCAL INFILE is
+ replicated as LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE. (Bug
+ #34628)
+
Modified: trunk/refman-4.1/sql-syntax.xml
===================================================================
--- trunk/refman-4.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442)
+++ trunk/refman-4.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443)
Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 5, Lines Deleted: 0; 606 bytes
@@ -5518,6 +5518,11 @@
+ CONCURRENT is not replicated. See
+ , for more information.
+
+
+
The LOCAL keyword, if specified, is
interpreted with respect to the client end of the connection:
Modified: trunk/refman-5.0/replication-notes.xml
===================================================================
--- trunk/refman-5.0/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442)
+++ trunk/refman-5.0/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443)
Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 9, Lines Deleted: 0; 965 bytes
@@ -519,6 +519,15 @@
+ The LOAD DATA INFILE statement's
+ CONCURRENT option is not replicated; that is,
+ LOAD DATA CONCURRENT INFILE is replicated as
+ LOAD DATA INFILE, and LOAD DATA
+ CONCURRENT LOCAL INFILE is replicated as LOAD
+ DATA LOCAL INFILE. (Bug #34628)
+
+
+
The following applies only if either the master or the
slave is running MySQL version 5.0.3 or older: If on
the master a LOAD DATA INFILE is interrupted
Modified: trunk/refman-5.0/sql-syntax.xml
===================================================================
--- trunk/refman-5.0/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442)
+++ trunk/refman-5.0/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443)
Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 6, Lines Deleted: 0; 619 bytes
@@ -5563,6 +5563,12 @@
+ CONCURRENT is not replicated. See
+ , for more
+ information.
+
+
+
The LOCAL keyword, if specified, is
interpreted with respect to the client end of the connection:
Modified: trunk/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml
===================================================================
--- trunk/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442)
+++ trunk/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443)
Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 12, Lines Deleted: 0; 1015 bytes
@@ -999,6 +999,18 @@
running MySQL 4.0 or earlier.
+
+ When using statement-based replication, the LOAD DATA
+ INFILE statement's CONCURRENT
+ option is not replicated; that is, LOAD DATA CONCURRENT
+ INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA
+ INFILE, and LOAD DATA CONCURRENT LOCAL
+ INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA LOCAL
+ INFILE. The CONCURRENT option
+ is replicated when using row-based
+ replication. (Bug #34628)
+
+
Modified: trunk/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml
===================================================================
--- trunk/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442)
+++ trunk/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443)
Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 8, Lines Deleted: 0; 748 bytes
@@ -7944,6 +7944,14 @@
even if no other thread is using the table at the same time.
+
+ CONCURRENT is not replicated when using
+ statement-based replication; however, it is replicated when
+ using row-based replication. See
+ , for more
+ information.
+
+
Prior to MySQL 5.1.23, LOAD DATA performed
Modified: trunk/refman-6.0/replication-notes.xml
===================================================================
--- trunk/refman-6.0/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442)
+++ trunk/refman-6.0/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443)
Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 12, Lines Deleted: 0; 1015 bytes
@@ -968,6 +968,18 @@
running MySQL 4.0 or earlier.
+
+ When using statement-based replication, the LOAD DATA
+ INFILE statement's CONCURRENT
+ option is not replicated; that is, LOAD DATA CONCURRENT
+ INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA
+ INFILE, and LOAD DATA CONCURRENT LOCAL
+ INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA LOCAL
+ INFILE. The CONCURRENT option
+ is replicated when using row-based
+ replication. (Bug #34628)
+
+
Modified: trunk/refman-6.0/sql-syntax.xml
===================================================================
--- trunk/refman-6.0/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442)
+++ trunk/refman-6.0/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443)
Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 8, Lines Deleted: 0; 747 bytes
@@ -7811,6 +7811,14 @@
even if no other thread is using the table at the same time.
+
+ CONCURRENT is not replicated when using
+ statement-based replication; however, it is replicated when
+ using row-based replication. See
+ , for more
+ information.
+
+
Prior to MySQL 6.0.4, LOAD DATA performed