From: Date: April 10 2008 5:56pm Subject: svn commit - mysqldoc@docsrva: r10443 - in trunk: it/refman-5.1 pt/refman-5.1 refman-4.1 refman-5.0 refman-5.1 refman-6.0 List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/45206 Message-Id: <200804101556.m3AFuiMk002776@docsrva.mysql.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Author: jstephens Date: 2008-04-10 17:56:43 +0200 (Thu, 10 Apr 2008) New Revision: 10443 Log: CONCURRENT replicated by RBR, but not replicated by SBR (Ref. Bug #34628 - Thanks, Sveta!) Modified: trunk/it/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml trunk/it/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml trunk/pt/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml trunk/pt/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml trunk/refman-4.1/replication.xml trunk/refman-4.1/sql-syntax.xml trunk/refman-5.0/replication-notes.xml trunk/refman-5.0/sql-syntax.xml trunk/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml trunk/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml trunk/refman-6.0/replication-notes.xml trunk/refman-6.0/sql-syntax.xml Modified: trunk/it/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml =================================================================== --- trunk/it/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442) +++ trunk/it/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443) Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 12, Lines Deleted: 0; 1024 bytes @@ -958,6 +958,18 @@ running MySQL 4.0 or earlier. + + When using statement-based replication, the LOAD DATA + INFILE statement's CONCURRENT + option is not replicated; that is, LOAD DATA CONCURRENT + INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA + INFILE, and LOAD DATA CONCURRENT LOCAL + INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA LOCAL + INFILE. The CONCURRENT option + is replicated when using row-based + replication. (Bug #34628) + +
Modified: trunk/it/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml =================================================================== --- trunk/it/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442) +++ trunk/it/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443) Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 8, Lines Deleted: 0; 757 bytes @@ -7927,6 +7927,14 @@ even if no other thread is using the table at the same time. + + CONCURRENT is not replicated when using + statement-based replication; however, it is replicated when + using row-based replication. See + , for more + information. + + Prior to MySQL 5.1.23, LOAD DATA performed Modified: trunk/pt/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml =================================================================== --- trunk/pt/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442) +++ trunk/pt/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443) Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 12, Lines Deleted: 0; 1024 bytes @@ -958,6 +958,18 @@ running MySQL 4.0 or earlier. + + When using statement-based replication, the LOAD DATA + INFILE statement's CONCURRENT + option is not replicated; that is, LOAD DATA CONCURRENT + INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA + INFILE, and LOAD DATA CONCURRENT LOCAL + INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA LOCAL + INFILE. The CONCURRENT option + is replicated when using row-based + replication. (Bug #34628) + +
Modified: trunk/pt/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml =================================================================== --- trunk/pt/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442) +++ trunk/pt/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443) Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 8, Lines Deleted: 0; 757 bytes @@ -7927,6 +7927,14 @@ even if no other thread is using the table at the same time. + + CONCURRENT is not replicated when using + statement-based replication; however, it is replicated when + using row-based replication. See + , for more + information. + + Prior to MySQL 5.1.23, LOAD DATA performed Modified: trunk/refman-4.1/replication.xml =================================================================== --- trunk/refman-4.1/replication.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442) +++ trunk/refman-4.1/replication.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443) Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 10, Lines Deleted: 0; 877 bytes @@ -1807,6 +1807,16 @@ such cases, it is best to upgrade the master to 5.0 or later. (Bug #31240) + + + The LOAD DATA INFILE statement's + CONCURRENT option is not replicated; that + is, LOAD DATA CONCURRENT INFILE is + replicated as LOAD DATA INFILE, and + LOAD DATA CONCURRENT LOCAL INFILE is + replicated as LOAD DATA LOCAL INFILE. (Bug + #34628) + Modified: trunk/refman-4.1/sql-syntax.xml =================================================================== --- trunk/refman-4.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442) +++ trunk/refman-4.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443) Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 5, Lines Deleted: 0; 606 bytes @@ -5518,6 +5518,11 @@ + CONCURRENT is not replicated. See + , for more information. + + + The LOCAL keyword, if specified, is interpreted with respect to the client end of the connection: Modified: trunk/refman-5.0/replication-notes.xml =================================================================== --- trunk/refman-5.0/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442) +++ trunk/refman-5.0/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443) Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 9, Lines Deleted: 0; 965 bytes @@ -519,6 +519,15 @@ + The LOAD DATA INFILE statement's + CONCURRENT option is not replicated; that is, + LOAD DATA CONCURRENT INFILE is replicated as + LOAD DATA INFILE, and LOAD DATA + CONCURRENT LOCAL INFILE is replicated as LOAD + DATA LOCAL INFILE. (Bug #34628) + + + The following applies only if either the master or the slave is running MySQL version 5.0.3 or older: If on the master a LOAD DATA INFILE is interrupted Modified: trunk/refman-5.0/sql-syntax.xml =================================================================== --- trunk/refman-5.0/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442) +++ trunk/refman-5.0/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443) Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 6, Lines Deleted: 0; 619 bytes @@ -5563,6 +5563,12 @@ + CONCURRENT is not replicated. See + , for more + information. + + + The LOCAL keyword, if specified, is interpreted with respect to the client end of the connection: Modified: trunk/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml =================================================================== --- trunk/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442) +++ trunk/refman-5.1/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443) Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 12, Lines Deleted: 0; 1015 bytes @@ -999,6 +999,18 @@ running MySQL 4.0 or earlier. + + When using statement-based replication, the LOAD DATA + INFILE statement's CONCURRENT + option is not replicated; that is, LOAD DATA CONCURRENT + INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA + INFILE, and LOAD DATA CONCURRENT LOCAL + INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA LOCAL + INFILE. The CONCURRENT option + is replicated when using row-based + replication. (Bug #34628) + +
Modified: trunk/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml =================================================================== --- trunk/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442) +++ trunk/refman-5.1/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443) Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 8, Lines Deleted: 0; 748 bytes @@ -7944,6 +7944,14 @@ even if no other thread is using the table at the same time. + + CONCURRENT is not replicated when using + statement-based replication; however, it is replicated when + using row-based replication. See + , for more + information. + + Prior to MySQL 5.1.23, LOAD DATA performed Modified: trunk/refman-6.0/replication-notes.xml =================================================================== --- trunk/refman-6.0/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442) +++ trunk/refman-6.0/replication-notes.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443) Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 12, Lines Deleted: 0; 1015 bytes @@ -968,6 +968,18 @@ running MySQL 4.0 or earlier. + + When using statement-based replication, the LOAD DATA + INFILE statement's CONCURRENT + option is not replicated; that is, LOAD DATA CONCURRENT + INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA + INFILE, and LOAD DATA CONCURRENT LOCAL + INFILE is replicated as LOAD DATA LOCAL + INFILE. The CONCURRENT option + is replicated when using row-based + replication. (Bug #34628) + +
Modified: trunk/refman-6.0/sql-syntax.xml =================================================================== --- trunk/refman-6.0/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 14:23:13 UTC (rev 10442) +++ trunk/refman-6.0/sql-syntax.xml 2008-04-10 15:56:43 UTC (rev 10443) Changed blocks: 1, Lines Added: 8, Lines Deleted: 0; 747 bytes @@ -7811,6 +7811,14 @@ even if no other thread is using the table at the same time. + + CONCURRENT is not replicated when using + statement-based replication; however, it is replicated when + using row-based replication. See + , for more + information. + + Prior to MySQL 6.0.4, LOAD DATA performed