List:Commits« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Serge Kozlov Date:April 3 2008 11:15am
Subject:Re: bk commit into 5.1 tree (skozlov:1.2567), please review
View as plain text  
Hi, Ingo.

thanks for your notes!

Ingo Strüwing wrote:
> Hi Serge,
> 
> Serge Kozlov, 03.04.2008 10:48:
> ...
>> Ingo Strüwing wrote:
> ...
>>> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysqltest/en/tutorial-coding-guidelines.html
>> Doc says nothing that about adding author/date but example there at end
>> of page contains:
>>
>> # Creation:                                                            #
>> # 2007-08-09 mleich Implement this test as part of                     #
>> #                   WL#3982 Test information_schema.processlist        #
>>
>> I can change header by guidelines from example in short format like that:
>>
>> Creation: 2008-03-11 skozlov
> 
> I don't know how strong this format needs to be followed. Writing you
> name in full should also be ok, if you prefer.
> 
> My whole motivation was to make this guideline known. I was inspired by
> your dispute if the author should be named or not. The example seems to
> answer this with "yes".
> 
> Regards
> Ingo


-- 
Serge Kozlov, QA Developer
MySQL AB, Moscow, Russia, www.mysql.com
Office:

Are you MySQL certified?  www.mysql.com/certification
Thread
Re: bk commit into 5.1 tree (skozlov:1.2567), please reviewSven Sandberg31 Mar
  • Re: bk commit into 5.1 tree (skozlov:1.2567), please reviewSerge Kozlov31 Mar
    • Re: bk commit into 5.1 tree (skozlov:1.2567), please reviewIngo Strüwing3 Apr
      • Re: bk commit into 5.1 tree (skozlov:1.2567), please reviewSerge Kozlov3 Apr
        • Re: bk commit into 5.1 tree (skozlov:1.2567), please reviewIngo Strüwing3 Apr
          • Re: bk commit into 5.1 tree (skozlov:1.2567), please reviewSerge Kozlov3 Apr
      • Re: bk commit into 5.1 tree (skozlov:1.2567), please reviewSven Sandberg3 Apr
    • Re: bk commit into 5.1 tree (skozlov:1.2567), please reviewSven Sandberg3 Apr