List:Commits« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Rafal Somla Date:March 17 2008 11:31am
Subject:Re: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2579) WL#4212
View as plain text  
Chuck,

Chuck Bell wrote:
> Rafal,
>  
> I will try and give you all the information I can discern.
> 
> After running this several times I discovered it doesn't always crash in the
> same place in the test -- just the code. I agree that there is something
> funny going on. 
> 
> So I implemented the "when all else fails on Windows, rebuild from scratch."
> Which improved the problems as it manages to execute correctly most of the
> time, but still crashes in the same manner once in a while.
> 
> Very strange. I am sorry, I cannot explain this behavior. I will try and
> work on it a bit more next week. 
> 

It is worrying that you still observe the crashes. I analysed clean-up of 
Backup_restore_ctx and related objects and couldn't find any obvious errors. I 
think it is impossible to trace this issue down until we can reproduce it. I run 
backup tests several times on my machine and they always pass.

> I will not hold up the review for this. If we find that PB finds the
> problems we can go back and look at it. Do you agree?
>

Yes, if possible and if you agree I think we should push this one finally - so 
many other changes are waiting for that.

Rafal

Thread
bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2579) WL#4212rsomla11 Mar
  • RE: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2579) WL#4212Chuck Bell12 Mar
RE: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2579) WL#4212Rafal Somla14 Mar
  • RE: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2579) WL#4212Chuck Bell14 Mar
    • Re: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2579) WL#4212Rafal Somla17 Mar