List:Commits« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Chuck Bell Date:November 29 2007 3:14pm
Subject:RE: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2667) WL#4060
View as plain text  
Rafal,

My responses... 

> Chuk, 

Never been called that before... ;) Have you heard the saying, "I've been
called worse by better people."? Is there something like that in Polish?

> 1. First I'll modify my patches to take into account all 
> changes not related to the merge. I'll send replies to your 
> review emails for each patch describing what I'm going to do.

ok

> 2. Then I'll do the merge and send you a separate merge patch, which
> (unfortunately) will be incremental, i.e. to be applied over 
> the previous patches.
> 
> Hope this is ok.

yes

> > 1) ensure meta_backup.cc and sql_backup.cc files get removed
> 
> I think leaving renamed files in place is a feature of bk. If 
> I clone my repository, the old files are not present any more.

I suspected as much.

> > 2) repair the data_backup.cc file to replace the ddl 
> blocker and fkey 
> > code
> 
> I'll do that when I merge with current tree.

Ok
 
> > 3) fix the Windows compilation errors/warnings in stream_v1.c
> > 
> 
> I'll do that in the patch for backup stream library (the second patch)
> 
> BTW. Could you do this experiment for me: remove any 
> definitions/declarations of 
> bzero() functions in stream_v1* files and replace them/it by
> 
> #define bzero(A,B)     memset((A),0,(B))
> 
> Then see if it will compile without a warning. Thanks!

It compiles with the same warnings and errors. The only one that works (on
Windows) is:

# define bzero(A,B)  memset((A),0,(B))

Chuck

Thread
bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2667) WL#4060rsomla21 Nov
  • RE: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2667) WL#4060Chuck Bell28 Nov
    • Re: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2667) WL#4060Rafal Somla29 Nov
      • RE: bk commit into 6.0 tree (rafal:1.2667) WL#4060Chuck Bell29 Nov