Monty Taylor wrote:
> So we have a client who Johan has said needs to use
> interpretedUpdates... is there any plan for having them supported? Or
> should I just keep them there and be aware that they might change out
> from under me?
either
1) being aware, cause we're not going to remove functionality
2) i assume he needs it for some counter....maybe you could expose a "counter" somehow
and keep that interface stable regardless what changes we do...
/Jonas
>
> Jonas Oreland wrote:
>> not an publicly supported api...
>> i.e might be changed/deprectade w/ notice
>>
>> /jonas
>>
>> Monty Taylor wrote:
>>> At http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ndb-connectors/ndb-connectors/ndbjmerge
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> revno: 183
>>> revision-id: mtaylor@stripped
>>> parent: mtaylor@stripped
>>> committer: Monty Taylor <mtaylor@stripped>
>>> branch nick: ndbjmerge
>>> timestamp: Wed 2007-10-17 14:54:04 -0700
>>> message:
>>> Added NdbInterpretedOperation interface to NdbOperation.
>>> modified:
>>> java/com/mysql/cluster/ndbj/NdbOperation.java
>>> ndboperation.java-20070517181935-98huwjarzuh25b30-19
>>> === modified file 'java/com/mysql/cluster/ndbj/NdbOperation.java'
>>> --- a/java/com/mysql/cluster/ndbj/NdbOperation.java 2007-09-30
>>> 02:06:41 +0000
>>> +++ b/java/com/mysql/cluster/ndbj/NdbOperation.java 2007-10-17
>>> 21:54:04 +0000
>>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
>>> * @see com.mysql.cluster.ndbj.NdbScanOperation
>>> * @see com.mysql.cluster.ndbj.NdbIndexScanOperation
>>> */
>>> -public interface NdbOperation extends NdbBaseOperationEquals {
>>> +public interface NdbOperation extends NdbBaseOperationEquals,
>>> NdbInterpretedOperation {
>>>
>>> public enum LockMode {
>>> LM_Read(0), ///< Read with shared lock
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
