List:Commits« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Stewart Smith Date:July 6 2007 7:20am
Subject:Re: Please review---[Fwd: bk commit - 5.0 tree
(gni:1.2473) BUG#17788]
View as plain text  
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 11:57 +0800, Guangbao Ni wrote:
> Stewart Smith Write:
> > On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 17:12 +0800, Guangbao Ni wrote:
> >   
> >>         +void Dblqh::execSTART_LCPIMME_CONF(Signal* signal)
> >>         +{
> >>         +  jamEntry();
> >>         +  lcpStartImmeResponded = true;
> >>         +  return;
> >>         +}
> >>     
> >
> > Should we reset lcpStartImmeResponded at end of LCP instead?
> >
> >   
> no, lcpStartImmeResponded here just means that the master DIH has
> received the START_LCPIMME_REQ.
> > Otherwise (i think) we could keep sending START_LCPIMME_REQ while one is
> > already ongoing if we keep filling up the log?
> >
> >   
> This is a good question. I have considered it.
> when LCP is already ongoing it can't keep sending STAR_LCPIMME_REQ.
> Because if lcp is going, then
> clcpCompletedState != LCP_IDLE. Only if clcpCompletedState == LCP_IDLE,
> STAR_LCPIMME_REQ signal can be sent

Okay, missed that :) good.

> > Also, I think it should be reset on master failure so we send to new
> > master.
> >
> >   
> Right, I will add the code.

(will be good to have test case for this too)
-- 
Stewart Smith, Senior Software Engineer
MySQL AB, www.mysql.com
Office: +14082136540 Ext: 6616
VoIP: 6616@stripped
Mobile: +61 4 3 8844 332

Jumpstart your cluster:
http://www.mysql.com/consulting/packaged/cluster.html

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] This is a digitally signed message part signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature]
Thread
Re: Please review---[Fwd: bk commit - 5.0 tree (gni:1.2473)BUG#17788]Stewart Smith5 Jul
  • Re: Please review---[Fwd: bk commit - 5.0 tree (gni:1.2473) BUG#17788]Guangbao Ni6 Jul
Re: Please review---[Fwd: bk commit - 5.0 tree(gni:1.2473) BUG#17788]Stewart Smith6 Jul
  • Re: Please review---[Fwd: bk commit - 5.0 tree (gni:1.2473) BUG#17788]Guangbao Ni9 Jul