List:Commits« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:marc.alff Date:December 4 2006 11:31pm
Subject:bk commit into 5.1 tree (malff:1.2373)
View as plain text  
Below is the list of changes that have just been committed into a local
5.1 repository of marcsql. When marcsql does a push these changes will
be propagated to the main repository and, within 24 hours after the
push, to the public repository.
For information on how to access the public repository
see http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/installing-source-tree.html

ChangeSet@stripped, 2006-12-04 16:31:30-07:00, malff@weblab.(none) +1 -0
  No bug number.
  Fixed typos in the comments.

  sql/sql_yacc.yy@stripped, 2006-12-04 16:31:27-07:00, malff@weblab.(none) +3 -3
    Fixed typos

# This is a BitKeeper patch.  What follows are the unified diffs for the
# set of deltas contained in the patch.  The rest of the patch, the part
# that BitKeeper cares about, is below these diffs.
# User:	malff
# Host:	weblab.(none)
# Root:	/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.1-typos

--- 1.520/sql/sql_yacc.yy	2006-12-04 16:31:36 -07:00
+++ 1.521/sql/sql_yacc.yy	2006-12-04 16:31:36 -07:00
@@ -6280,7 +6280,7 @@ function_call_nonkeyword:
         ;
 
 /*
-  Functions calls using a non reserved keywork, and using a regular syntax.
+  Functions calls using a non reserved keyword, and using a regular syntax.
   Because the non reserved keyword is used in another part of the grammar,
   a dedicated rule is needed here.
 */
@@ -6495,7 +6495,7 @@ function_call_generic:
             parser and the implementation in item_create.cc clean,
             since this will change with WL#2128 (SQL PATH):
             - INFORMATION_SCHEMA.version() is the SQL 99 syntax for the native
-            funtion version(),
+            function version(),
             - MySQL.version() is the SQL 2003 syntax for the native function
             version() (a vendor can specify any schema).
           */
@@ -6608,7 +6608,7 @@ sum_expr:
 	  { $$=new Item_sum_min($3); }
 /*
    According to ANSI SQL, DISTINCT is allowed and has
-   no sence inside MIN and MAX grouping functions; so MIN|MAX(DISTINCT ...)
+   no sense inside MIN and MAX grouping functions; so MIN|MAX(DISTINCT ...)
    is processed like an ordinary MIN | MAX()
  */
 	| MIN_SYM '(' DISTINCT in_sum_expr ')'
Thread
bk commit into 5.1 tree (malff:1.2373)marc.alff5 Dec