Thank you for the new patch. I have one question before approving.
On 05/04/2011 03:24 PM, Olav Sandstaa wrote:
> @@ -4869,7 +4869,26 @@ int DsMrr_impl::dsmrr_init(handler *h_ar
> We get here when the access alternates betwen MRR scan(s) and non-MRR
> + */
> + /*
> + Verify consistency between the two handler objects:
> + 1. The main handler should either use the primary key or not have an
> + active index at this point since the clone handler (h2) is used for
> + reading the index.
> + 2. The index used for ICP should be the same for the two handlers or
> + it should not be set on the clone handler (h2).
> + 3. The ICP function should be the same for the two handlers or it should
> + not be set for the clone handler (h2).
In which case(s) will h but not h2 have a pushed index after the cloning has
Jørgen Løland | Senior Software Engineer | +47 73842138