From: Sergey Glukhov Date: April 22 2011 8:06am Subject: bzr push into mysql-5.1 branch (sergey.glukhov:3667 to 3668) Bug#11756928 List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/135947 X-Bug: 11756928 Message-Id: <201104220805.p3M85Zdm003156@acsmt358.oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 3668 Sergey Glukhov 2011-04-22 Bug#11756928 48916: SERVER INCORRECTLY PROCESSING HAVING CLAUSES WITH AN ORDER BY CLAUSE Before sorting HAVING condition is split into two parts, first part is a table related condition and the rest of is HAVING part. Extraction of HAVING part does not take into account the fact that some of conditions might be non-const but have 'used_tables' == 0 (independent subqueries) and because of that these conditions are cut off by make_cond_for_table() function. The fix is to use (table_map) 0 instead of used_tables in third argument for make_cond_for_table() function. It allows to extract elements which belong to sorted table and in addition elements which are independend subqueries. @ mysql-test/r/having.result test case @ mysql-test/t/having.test test case @ sql/sql_select.cc The fix is to use (table_map) 0 instead of used_tables in third argument for make_cond_for_table() function. It allows to extract elements which belong to sorted table and in addition elements which are independend subqueries. modified: mysql-test/r/having.result mysql-test/t/having.test sql/sql_select.cc 3667 Jon Olav Hauglid 2011-04-20 BUG#12377872 ASSERTION FAILED: !_ENTERED WHEN GETHOSTBYADDR_R FAILS ON SOLARIS This assertion was triggered if gethostbyaddr_r cannot do a reverse lookup on an ip address. The reason was a missing DBUG_RETURN macro. The problem affected only debug versions of the server. This patch fixes the problem by replacing return with DBUG_RETURN. No test case added. modified: sql/hostname.cc === modified file 'mysql-test/r/having.result' --- a/mysql-test/r/having.result 2010-07-09 10:39:47 +0000 +++ b/mysql-test/r/having.result 2011-04-22 07:20:55 +0000 @@ -545,4 +545,26 @@ FROM t1 JOIN t2 ON t2.f2 LIKE 'x' HAVING field1 < 7; field1 DROP TABLE t1,t2; +# +# Bug#48916 Server incorrectly processing HAVING clauses with an ORDER BY clause +# +CREATE TABLE t1 (f1 INT, f2 INT); +INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1, 0), (2, 1), (3, 2); +CREATE TABLE t2 (f1 INT, f2 INT); +SELECT t1.f1 +FROM t1 +HAVING (3, 2) IN (SELECT f1, f2 FROM t2) AND t1.f1 >= 0 +ORDER BY t1.f1; +f1 +SELECT t1.f1 +FROM t1 +HAVING (3, 2) IN (SELECT 4, 2) AND t1.f1 >= 0 +ORDER BY t1.f1; +f1 +SELECT t1.f1 +FROM t1 +HAVING 2 IN (SELECT f2 FROM t2) AND t1.f1 >= 0 +ORDER BY t1.f1; +f1 +DROP TABLE t1,t2; End of 5.1 tests === modified file 'mysql-test/t/having.test' --- a/mysql-test/t/having.test 2010-07-09 10:39:47 +0000 +++ b/mysql-test/t/having.test 2011-04-22 07:20:55 +0000 @@ -564,4 +564,30 @@ HAVING field1 < 7; DROP TABLE t1,t2; +--echo # +--echo # Bug#48916 Server incorrectly processing HAVING clauses with an ORDER BY clause +--echo # + +CREATE TABLE t1 (f1 INT, f2 INT); +INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1, 0), (2, 1), (3, 2); +CREATE TABLE t2 (f1 INT, f2 INT); + +SELECT t1.f1 +FROM t1 +HAVING (3, 2) IN (SELECT f1, f2 FROM t2) AND t1.f1 >= 0 +ORDER BY t1.f1; + +SELECT t1.f1 +FROM t1 +HAVING (3, 2) IN (SELECT 4, 2) AND t1.f1 >= 0 +ORDER BY t1.f1; + +SELECT t1.f1 +FROM t1 +HAVING 2 IN (SELECT f2 FROM t2) AND t1.f1 >= 0 +ORDER BY t1.f1; + +DROP TABLE t1,t2; + + --echo End of 5.1 tests === modified file 'sql/sql_select.cc' --- a/sql/sql_select.cc 2011-04-14 14:35:24 +0000 +++ b/sql/sql_select.cc 2011-04-22 07:20:55 +0000 @@ -2215,7 +2215,7 @@ JOIN::exec() Item* sort_table_cond= make_cond_for_table(curr_join->tmp_having, used_tables, - used_tables); + (table_map) 0); if (sort_table_cond) { if (!curr_table->select) @@ -12852,6 +12852,42 @@ static bool test_if_ref(Item_field *left return 0; // keep test } +/** + Extract a condition that can be checked after reading given table + + @param cond Condition to analyze + @param tables Tables for which "current field values" are available + @param used_table Table that we're extracting the condition for (may + also include PSEUDO_TABLE_BITS, and may be zero) + @param exclude_expensive_cond Do not push expensive conditions + + @retval <>NULL Generated condition + @retval =NULL Already checked, OR error + + @details + Extract the condition that can be checked after reading the table + specified in 'used_table', given that current-field values for tables + specified in 'tables' bitmap are available. + If 'used_table' is 0 + - extract conditions for all tables in 'tables'. + - extract conditions are unrelated to any tables + in the same query block/level(i.e. conditions + which have used_tables == 0). + + The function assumes that + - Constant parts of the condition has already been checked. + - Condition that could be checked for tables in 'tables' has already + been checked. + + The function takes into account that some parts of the condition are + guaranteed to be true by employed 'ref' access methods (the code that + does this is located at the end, search down for "EQ_FUNC"). + + @note + Make sure to keep the implementations of make_cond_for_table() and + make_cond_after_sjm() synchronized. + make_cond_for_info_schema() uses similar algorithm as well. +*/ static COND * make_cond_for_table(COND *cond, table_map tables, table_map used_table) No bundle (reason: useless for push emails).