bzr commit into mysql-5.1-telco-7.0 branch (ole.john.aske:4112)

[Ole John Aske]

#At file:///net/fimafeng09/export/home/tmp/oleja/mysql/mysql-5.1-telco-7.0/ based on revid:ole.john.aske@stripped

 4112 Ole John Aske	2011-01-14
      Backport to mysql-5.1-telco-7.0:
      
      Fix for bug#58818: Incorrect result for IN/ANY subquery
      
      If the ::single_value_transformer() find an existing HAVING condition it used
      to do the transformation:
                        
        1) HAVING cond -> (HAVING Cond) AND (cond_guard (Item_ref_null_helper(...))
                  
      As the AND condition in 1) is Mc'Carty evaluated, the
      right side of the AND cond should be executed only if the 
      original 'HAVING evaluated' to true.
                  
      However, as we failed to set 'top_level' for the tranformed HAVING condition,
      'abort_on_null' was FALSE after transformation. An
      UNKNOWN having condition will then not terminate evaluation of the
      transformed having condition, and we incorrectly continued
      into the Item_ref_null_helper() part.

    modified:
      mysql-test/r/subselect.result
      mysql-test/t/subselect.test
      sql/item_subselect.cc
=== modified file 'mysql-test/r/subselect.result'
--- a/mysql-test/r/subselect.result	2010-04-15 14:04:24 +0000
+++ b/mysql-test/r/subselect.result	2011-01-14 13:36:47 +0000
@@ -4733,4 +4733,56 @@ ORDER BY (SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE MATCH(a
 SELECT * FROM t2 UNION SELECT * FROM t2
 ORDER BY (SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE MATCH(a) AGAINST ('+abc' IN BOOLEAN MODE));
 DROP TABLE t1,t2;
+#
+# Bug #58818: Incorrect result for IN/ANY subquery
+# with HAVING condition 
+#
+CREATE TABLE t1(i INT);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1), (2), (3);
+CREATE TABLE t1s(i INT);
+INSERT INTO t1s VALUES (10), (20), (30);
+CREATE TABLE t2s(i INT);
+INSERT INTO t2s VALUES (100), (200), (300);
+SELECT * FROM t1
+WHERE t1.i NOT IN
+(
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN t2s.i 
+FROM
+t1s LEFT OUTER JOIN t2s ON t2s.i = t1s.i
+HAVING t2s.i = 999
+);
+i
+1
+2
+3
+SELECT * FROM t1
+WHERE t1.I IN
+(
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN t2s.i 
+FROM
+t1s LEFT OUTER JOIN t2s ON t2s.i = t1s.i
+HAVING t2s.i = 999
+) IS UNKNOWN;
+i
+SELECT * FROM t1
+WHERE NOT t1.I = ANY
+(
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN t2s.i 
+FROM
+t1s LEFT OUTER JOIN t2s ON t2s.i = t1s.i
+HAVING t2s.i = 999
+);
+i
+1
+2
+3
+SELECT * FROM t1
+WHERE t1.i = ANY (
+SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN t2s.i 
+FROM
+t1s LEFT OUTER JOIN t2s ON t2s.i = t1s.i
+HAVING t2s.i = 999
+) IS UNKNOWN;
+i
+DROP TABLE t1,t1s,t2s;
 End of 5.1 tests

=== modified file 'mysql-test/t/subselect.test'
--- a/mysql-test/t/subselect.test	2010-04-15 14:04:24 +0000
+++ b/mysql-test/t/subselect.test	2011-01-14 13:36:47 +0000
@@ -3725,4 +3725,53 @@ SELECT * FROM t2 UNION SELECT * FROM t2
 DROP TABLE t1,t2;
 --enable_result_log
 
+--echo #
+--echo # Bug #58818: Incorrect result for IN/ANY subquery
+--echo # with HAVING condition 
+--echo #
+
+CREATE TABLE t1(i INT);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES (1), (2), (3);
+CREATE TABLE t1s(i INT);
+INSERT INTO t1s VALUES (10), (20), (30);
+CREATE TABLE t2s(i INT);
+INSERT INTO t2s VALUES (100), (200), (300);
+
+SELECT * FROM t1
+WHERE t1.i NOT IN
+(
+  SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN t2s.i 
+  FROM
+  t1s LEFT OUTER JOIN t2s ON t2s.i = t1s.i
+  HAVING t2s.i = 999
+);
+
+SELECT * FROM t1
+WHERE t1.I IN
+(
+  SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN t2s.i 
+  FROM
+  t1s LEFT OUTER JOIN t2s ON t2s.i = t1s.i
+  HAVING t2s.i = 999
+) IS UNKNOWN;
+
+SELECT * FROM t1
+WHERE NOT t1.I = ANY
+(
+  SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN t2s.i 
+  FROM
+  t1s LEFT OUTER JOIN t2s ON t2s.i = t1s.i
+  HAVING t2s.i = 999
+);
+
+SELECT * FROM t1
+ WHERE t1.i = ANY (
+  SELECT STRAIGHT_JOIN t2s.i 
+  FROM
+  t1s LEFT OUTER JOIN t2s ON t2s.i = t1s.i
+  HAVING t2s.i = 999
+ ) IS UNKNOWN;
+
+DROP TABLE t1,t1s,t2s;
+
 --echo End of 5.1 tests

=== modified file 'sql/item_subselect.cc'
--- a/sql/item_subselect.cc	2010-10-06 10:06:47 +0000
+++ b/sql/item_subselect.cc	2011-01-14 13:36:47 +0000
@@ -1131,6 +1131,9 @@ Item_in_subselect::single_value_transfor
     select_lex->having= join->having= and_items(join->having, item);
     if (join->having == item)
       item->name= (char*)in_having_cond;
+#ifndef MCP_BUG58818
+    select_lex->having->top_level_item();
+#endif
     select_lex->having_fix_field= 1;
     /*
       we do not check join->having->fixed, because Item_and (from and_items)


Attachment: [text/bzr-bundle] bzr/[e-mail]