On 09/27/2010 11:41 AM, Luís Soares wrote:
> Hi Alfranio,
> On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 10:59 +0100, Alfranio Correia wrote:
>> Hi Luis,
>> The patch looks great but I have a few concerns.
>> There is a change in behavior and for that reason the patch should not
>> be pushed into 5.1-bugteam. Geert Vanderkelen seems to agree with this.
> Yes, I think we should not push to 5.1 (or 5.5).
>> If the patch will not be pushed into 5.1 and 5.5, I think we should not
>> fix the bug and should just create a build for Ericsson. The filters
>> should be changed and completely redesigned as you already know. Maybe
>> this is the time for this because some of the changes necessary to have
>> great filters are also necessary to have the multi-thread slave.
> Yes, they should be redesigned/replaced/improved on... But until then, I
> say we fix such little things as this one on what we have today. If it
> was a big effort, then I would agree to wait for a new filtering
> approach (maybe based on WL#4008, WL#5287 and/or WL#2387). Since it's
> not, then why not have this in anyway?
I think you should not fix this as there is only one customer requesting
this feature and this customer uses 5.1 and will not migrate to any newer
So I think you should just aim at having a final solution as there is
no hurry for a quick fix.
>> Let's have a call next week to discuss further details on my idea.
>> See some comments in-line that you need to address.