List:Cluster« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Mikael Ronström Date:July 7 2004 1:23pm
Subject:Re: best filesystem for cluster & api memory
View as plain text  
Hi Matteo,

2004-07-07 kl. 12.09 skrev Matteo Brancaleoni:

> Hi all.
>
> I'm going to test the cluster in a semi-production
> environment, since all tests since now are ok.
> now I'm wondering...
> * what can be the best fs to use?
>   ext2? ext3? perhaps with the sync option?

Have had better experience with ext3 than ext2.
Best experience actually with XFS since pretty high
write loads with large writes (usually 256 kBytes)
but ext3 is good enough.

> * if the api (ie mysqld) is on another machine,
>   not on the storage engine, needs the same
>   amount of memory (aka very much) as the db node?
>   I think no, but wanna be sure.

Yes, mysqld memory and storage node memory is independent issues.

Rgrds Mikael

>
> Thanks a lot,
> Matteo
> -- 
> Matteo Brancaleoni <mbrancaleoni@stripped>
> Espia - Emmegi Srl
>
>
> -- 
> MySQL Cluster Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/cluster
> To unsubscribe:    
> http://lists.mysql.com/cluster?unsub=1
>
Mikael Ronström, Senior Software Architect
MySQL AB, www.mysql.com

Clustering:
http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/04/14/HNmysqlcluster_1.html

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1567546,00.asp


Thread
best filesystem for cluster & api memoryMatteo Brancaleoni7 Jul
  • Re: best filesystem for cluster & api memoryMikael Ronström7 Jul