Hi,
16 nov 2007 kl. 08.13 skrev MuraliPD@GMail:
> Hi John,
>
> But MYSQL 5.1 is not yet in Production rite?
>
It's not a GA version yet, currently an RC. However it's been in long
use in production at various customers.
Rgrds Mikael
> As performance vise, Tables with NDB storage Engine will give us
> better
> performance in Searching Text and Retrieving Large Data like XML
> from the DB
> [As similar to MYISAM].
>
>
> Thanks,
> V.Murali
> Keep in Touch...
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John David Duncan [mailto:jdd@stripped]
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 12:32 PM
> To: MuraliPD@GMail
> Cc: 'Jonathan Haddad'; cluster@stripped
> Subject: Re: Cluster performance in web environment
>
>>> My own advice is like this: First, use 5.1. There's not really much
>>> reason to use 5.0 Cluster anymore. Second, Dolphin SCI cards
>>> cost as
>>> little as $1500 per box and can be well worth it.
>>
>> What this really means Cluster 5.0 and Cluster 5.1... As similar to
>> MYSQL
>> Version 5.0 and 5.1 .... Is that different versions available in the
>> MYSQL
>> CLUSTER 5.0 and 5.1?
>
> I mean MySQL 5.1.
>
> MySQL 5.1 is not yet generally available for production use. However,
> MySQL Cluster in MySQL 5.1 is generally better than 5.0
>
>> Don't really get this point..
>> Only tables with ndbcluster storage engine will be reflected to the
>> other
>> nodes then how can we maintain tables with InnoDB/MYISAM storage
>> engines in
>> the different nodes.
>
> InnoDB & MyISAM tables will be local to the MySQL server where they
> are resident. Only NDB (cluster) tables will be visible from multiple
> MySQL servers.
>
> JD
>
>
> --
> MySQL Cluster Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/cluster
> To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/cluster?
> unsub=mikael@stripped
>
