List:Cluster« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:John David Duncan Date:November 16 2007 7:01am
Subject:Re: Cluster performance in web environment
View as plain text  
>> My own advice is like this: First, use 5.1.  There's not really much
>> reason to use 5.0 Cluster anymore.  Second, Dolphin SCI cards cost as
>> little as $1500 per box and can be well worth it.
>
> What this really means Cluster 5.0 and Cluster 5.1... As similar to  
> MYSQL
> Version 5.0 and 5.1 .... Is that different versions available in the  
> MYSQL
> CLUSTER 5.0 and 5.1?

I mean MySQL 5.1.

MySQL 5.1 is not yet generally available for production use.  However,  
MySQL Cluster in MySQL 5.1 is generally better than 5.0

> Don't really get this point..
> Only tables with ndbcluster storage engine will be reflected to the  
> other
> nodes then how can we maintain tables with InnoDB/MYISAM storage  
> engines in
> the different nodes.

InnoDB & MyISAM tables will be local to the MySQL server where they  
are resident.  Only NDB (cluster) tables will be visible from multiple  
MySQL servers.

JD

Thread
Cluster performance in web environmentJonathan Haddad14 Nov
  • Re: Cluster performance in web environmentJohn David Duncan15 Nov
    • RE: Cluster performance in web environmentMuraliPD@GMail16 Nov
      • Re: Cluster performance in web environmentJohn David Duncan16 Nov
        • RE: Cluster performance in web environmentMuraliPD@GMail16 Nov
          • Re: Cluster performance in web environmentMikael Ronström16 Nov
            • RE: Cluster performance in web environmentMuraliPD@GMail16 Nov
              • Re: Cluster performance in web environmentMikael Ronström16 Nov
          • Re: Cluster performance in web environmentJon Stephens16 Nov
  • RE: Cluster performance in web environmentMuraliPD@GMail16 Nov
  • Re: Cluster performance in web environmentMikael Ronström16 Nov