| List: | Cluster | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | John David Duncan | Date: | November 16 2007 7:01am |
| Subject: | Re: Cluster performance in web environment | ||
| View as plain text | |||
>> My own advice is like this: First, use 5.1. There's not really much >> reason to use 5.0 Cluster anymore. Second, Dolphin SCI cards cost as >> little as $1500 per box and can be well worth it. > > What this really means Cluster 5.0 and Cluster 5.1... As similar to > MYSQL > Version 5.0 and 5.1 .... Is that different versions available in the > MYSQL > CLUSTER 5.0 and 5.1? I mean MySQL 5.1. MySQL 5.1 is not yet generally available for production use. However, MySQL Cluster in MySQL 5.1 is generally better than 5.0 > Don't really get this point.. > Only tables with ndbcluster storage engine will be reflected to the > other > nodes then how can we maintain tables with InnoDB/MYISAM storage > engines in > the different nodes. InnoDB & MyISAM tables will be local to the MySQL server where they are resident. Only NDB (cluster) tables will be visible from multiple MySQL servers. JD
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Cluster performance in web environment | Jonathan Haddad | 14 Nov |
| • Re: Cluster performance in web environment | John David Duncan | 15 Nov |
| • RE: Cluster performance in web environment | MuraliPD@GMail | 16 Nov |
| • Re: Cluster performance in web environment | John David Duncan | 16 Nov |
| • RE: Cluster performance in web environment | MuraliPD@GMail | 16 Nov |
| • Re: Cluster performance in web environment | Mikael Ronström | 16 Nov |
| • RE: Cluster performance in web environment | MuraliPD@GMail | 16 Nov |
| • Re: Cluster performance in web environment | Mikael Ronström | 16 Nov |
| • Re: Cluster performance in web environment | Jon Stephens | 16 Nov |
| • RE: Cluster performance in web environment | MuraliPD@GMail | 16 Nov |
| • Re: Cluster performance in web environment | Mikael Ronström | 16 Nov |
