| List: | Cluster | « Previous MessageNext Message » | |
| From: | Jonathan Haddad | Date: | November 14 2007 5:39am |
| Subject: | Cluster performance in web environment | ||
| View as plain text | |||
Has anyone on the list set up cluster for use in a web environment? How
does the performance compare to innodb for selects based off an index?
How well does cluster perform with a lot of mixed reads / writes? (say 20
to 1?) If a table is constantly having rows inserted, are there any locking
issues we should be aware of? Usually we deal with this by partitioning
our tables into multiple machines. Is this necessary anymore?
Initially, there won't be much on here, but I'm expecting it to be running
this on 6x 16GB dual core boxes for the data nodes - will 1 table with 500
million rows and several hundred concurrent selects / inserts per second be
an issue?
Thanks,
Jon
--
Jon Haddad
jon@stripped
Letsgetnuts.com
| Thread | ||
|---|---|---|
| • Cluster performance in web environment | Jonathan Haddad | 14 Nov |
| • Re: Cluster performance in web environment | John David Duncan | 15 Nov |
| • RE: Cluster performance in web environment | MuraliPD@GMail | 16 Nov |
| • Re: Cluster performance in web environment | John David Duncan | 16 Nov |
| • RE: Cluster performance in web environment | MuraliPD@GMail | 16 Nov |
| • Re: Cluster performance in web environment | Mikael Ronström | 16 Nov |
| • RE: Cluster performance in web environment | MuraliPD@GMail | 16 Nov |
| • Re: Cluster performance in web environment | Mikael Ronström | 16 Nov |
| • Re: Cluster performance in web environment | Jon Stephens | 16 Nov |
| • RE: Cluster performance in web environment | MuraliPD@GMail | 16 Nov |
| • Re: Cluster performance in web environment | Mikael Ronström | 16 Nov |
