Re: Database Storage Capacity. (addendum)

[Devananda]

Devananda wrote:

> FYI, we just looked into putting a 75-100GB table into the cluster, but 
> figured out that we can house the same table by load balancing 
> traditional InnoDB databases across ~4 servers, rather than across ~16 
> with the cluster.

Realized that I didn't mention something which is imporant here - this 
table, though large, doens't handle more than 6,000 queries / second. If 
it needed to handle much more than that, we would probably need to put 
it into a cluster since we seem to be pushing our qps limit with it 
right now.