List:Cluster« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:pekka Date:November 11 2005 9:05am
Subject:Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?
View as plain text  
> Does that mean NDB performance is always gonna be 100-200% worse than InnoDB? I
> realize it's networked, but it's kind of a "gee whiz" cool thing unless the performance is
> good on industry-standard hardware.

Depends on application.  Parallel applications get better throughput.

Also, as an extreme NDB-biased example, imagine running a single
query with complex predicate.  If the predicate is pushed to 8 db
nodes, it could run 8 times faster than on single cpu.

-- 
Pekka Nousiainen, Software Engineer
MySQL AB, www.mysql.com
pekka@stripped +46 (0) 73 068 4978
Thread
Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams10 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Adam Dixon10 Nov
    • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Simon Garner10 Nov
RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams11 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?pekka11 Nov
    • Structures ReplicationFabricio Mota11 Nov
      • Re: Structures ReplicationStewart Smith11 Nov
        • RES: Structures ReplicationFabricio Mota11 Nov
          • Re: RES: Structures ReplicationStewart Smith1 Feb
    • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Mark Kirkwood14 Nov
      • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?pekka14 Nov
      • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Mikael Ronström15 Nov
RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams11 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Simon Garner11 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?pekka11 Nov
    • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Kenji HIROHAMA11 Nov
  • RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Stewart Smith12 Nov
RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams15 Nov
  • RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Stewart Smith15 Nov
RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams15 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Simon Garner15 Nov