List:Cluster« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Simon Garner Date:November 11 2005 2:01am
Subject:Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?
View as plain text  
On 11/11/2005 2:55 p.m., Jason Williams wrote:
> Pekka,
> 
>>InnoDB is within same process (mysqld).  NDB is networked.
> 
> Does that mean NDB performance is always gonna be 100-200% worse than InnoDB? I
> realize it's networked, but it's kind of a "gee whiz" cool thing unless the performance is
> good on industry-standard hardware.
> 
> -J

It may be slower in terms of absolute throughput or response times, 
however you gain in scalability (not to mention reliability).

In real world times we are finding performance is quite acceptable.

-Simon
Thread
Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams10 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Adam Dixon10 Nov
    • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Simon Garner10 Nov
RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams11 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?pekka11 Nov
    • Structures ReplicationFabricio Mota11 Nov
      • Re: Structures ReplicationStewart Smith11 Nov
        • RES: Structures ReplicationFabricio Mota11 Nov
          • Re: RES: Structures ReplicationStewart Smith1 Feb
    • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Mark Kirkwood14 Nov
      • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?pekka14 Nov
      • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Mikael Ronström15 Nov
RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams11 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Simon Garner11 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?pekka11 Nov
    • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Kenji HIROHAMA11 Nov
  • RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Stewart Smith12 Nov
RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams15 Nov
  • RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Stewart Smith15 Nov
RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams15 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Simon Garner15 Nov