List:Cluster« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Jason Williams Date:November 11 2005 1:55am
Subject:RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?
View as plain text  
Pekka,

	
>InnoDB is within same process (mysqld).  NDB is networked.

Does that mean NDB performance is always gonna be 100-200% worse than InnoDB? I realize
it's networked, but it's kind of a "gee whiz" cool thing unless the performance is good
on industry-standard hardware.

-J
Thread
Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams10 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Adam Dixon10 Nov
    • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Simon Garner10 Nov
RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams11 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?pekka11 Nov
    • Structures ReplicationFabricio Mota11 Nov
      • Re: Structures ReplicationStewart Smith11 Nov
        • RES: Structures ReplicationFabricio Mota11 Nov
          • Re: RES: Structures ReplicationStewart Smith1 Feb
    • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Mark Kirkwood14 Nov
      • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?pekka14 Nov
      • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Mikael Ronström15 Nov
RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams11 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Simon Garner11 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?pekka11 Nov
    • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Kenji HIROHAMA11 Nov
  • RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Stewart Smith12 Nov
RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams15 Nov
  • RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Stewart Smith15 Nov
RE: Disk-based storage...5.1?Jason Williams15 Nov
  • Re: Disk-based storage...5.1?Simon Garner15 Nov