From: Jeremy Zawodny Date: July 16 2004 1:32am Subject: Re: 157 GB MyISAM DB List-Archive: http://lists.mysql.com/cluster/146 Message-Id: <20040715183216.A62454@yahoo-inc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 04:29:56PM -0400, Richard F. Rebel wrote: > > Thanks Jonas, > > Are the storage requirements switching between innodb table spaces and > NDB spaces going to change? I know when I went from myisam to innodb > our requirements nearly doubled. Might by chance the requirements > decrease with NDB? You can certainly expect 'em to take more space than MyISAM. The MyISAM row format is very lean. It's hard to do better without compression. As for being bigger or smaller than InnoDB, that's something you'd really have to test out to be sure... -- Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo! | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/ [book] High Performance MySQL -- http://highperformancemysql.com/