List:Cluster« Previous MessageNext Message »
From:Jeremy Zawodny Date:July 16 2004 1:32am
Subject:Re: 157 GB MyISAM DB
View as plain text  
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 04:29:56PM -0400, Richard F. Rebel wrote:
> 
> Thanks Jonas,
> 
> Are the storage requirements switching between innodb table spaces and
> NDB spaces going to change?  I know when I went from myisam to innodb
> our requirements nearly doubled.  Might by chance the requirements
> decrease with NDB?

You can certainly expect 'em to take more space than MyISAM.  The
MyISAM row format is very lean.  It's hard to do better without
compression.

As for being bigger or smaller than InnoDB, that's something you'd
really have to test out to be sure...
-- 
Jeremy D. Zawodny     |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<Jeremy@stripped>  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/

[book] High Performance MySQL -- http://highperformancemysql.com/
Thread
157 GB MyISAM DBThomas B√∂hme13 Jul
  • Re: 157 GB MyISAM DBRichard F. Rebel14 Jul
    • Re: 157 GB MyISAM DBBrancaleoni Matteo14 Jul
    • Re: 157 GB MyISAM DBJonas Oreland14 Jul
      • Re: 157 GB MyISAM DBRichard F. Rebel14 Jul
        • Re: 157 GB MyISAM DBJonas Oreland14 Jul
        • Re: 157 GB MyISAM DBJeremy Zawodny16 Jul